Julie Struplova vs Angelica Raggi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent second serve performance, Angelica Raggi has a slight edge with a 37.77% win rate compared to Julie Struplova's 37.37%. How influential might this be for the match outcome? Perhaps not significantly, given the minimal difference.
• When returning second serves, Julie Struplova leads with 51.20% success compared to Raggi's 50.55%. This edge could be vital in gaining break opportunities.
• For first serve returns, Struplova again has the advantage, winning 40.02% versus Raggi's 36.64%. Might this be a decisive factor? It certainly improves her odds.
• Under pressure, Struplova shows more resilience by saving 50.29% of breakpoints, whereas Raggi saves 47.93%. Could this ability to save breakpoints tilt the match in her favor? Potentially yes, in tight sets.
• Over the past year, Struplova boasts a higher overall match win percentage at 65.71%, compared to Raggi’s 58.93%, indicating stronger form.
• Angelica Raggi excels on hard courts with a 64% win rate, but struggles on indoor hard courts (40%). In contrast, Julie Struplova thrives on clay (68%) but is less successful on hard surfaces, with no wins recorded.
• Both players compete frequently at challenger/ITF events above $10K, with Struplova winning 60.00% of her recent matches and Raggi winning 55.17%.
• Struplova faces slightly tougher opponents, with an average rank of 363.97 compared to Raggi's 377.95, suggesting she might be better prepared against higher-ranked players.
• If the match progresses to a deciding set, Struplova’s 64% win rate is notably superior to Raggi’s 47%, potentially giving her a psychological edge in tight scenarios.

Editorial Prediction (September 25, 2025, UTC):

Angelica Raggi and Julie Struplova face off in an intriguing matchup. Raggi shows marginal superiority in second serve performance, but Struplova consistently excels in return games, potentially influencing the match heavily.

Struplova's ability to handle pressure, as indicated by her breakpoint saving capability, could play a crucial role, particularly in close sets. Their overall match records over the past year suggest Struplova is in better form, winning a higher percentage of her matches.

While Raggi is strong on hard courts, the lack of indoor hard court performance is concerning against Struplova, who shows adaptability on clay. Struplova's recent encounters with higher-ranked opponents might prepare her more effectively for this match.

Considering these factors, Julie Struplova appears more likely to secure the win, given her superior return game, pressure handling, and overall form. However, the dynamics of this face-off could still yield surprises, especially on a favored surface for Raggi.